What are Open Educational Resources?
Open Educational Resources (OER) are freely available, reusable documents, assessments, courses media, textbooks, and more. They are shared by universities, colleges, individual instructors, and instructional designers to both assist instructors in teaching and to ease the financial burden for resources on students. This guide will provide you with links to find OER and links to create them yourself.
Why should faculty use or develop OERs?
OERs have a number of benefits. They can help with
Top Arguments for Open Educational Resources (OERs) |
Evidence and sources supporting these arguments |
Innovation: Open Educational Resources (OERs) Drive Innovation on Campuses
|
“According to the OPAL study (Andrade et al., 2011), educators, policy makers and institutional leaders largely agree that the use of OER: 1) leads to pedagogical changes (69%); 2) shifts education provision from content- to activity-based learning (62%); and 3) shifts the role of learners from passive receivers to active producers (64%). These results are based on an online survey administered in 2010 to educational practitioners in higher education and adult learning across the world (final sample N=581; 79% from EU member states).”
Orr, D., M. Rimini and D. van Damme (2015), Open Educational Resources: A catalyst for innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264247543-en
|
Quality: OERs Can Improve Quality of Content
|
“Because the Open Curriculum is licensed in such a way that we can revise materials directly, OHSU is able to engage in a highly data-driven curriculum improvement process…This information can be combined with item response theory and learning outcome analysis data to set priorities for curriculum or assessment revision empirically. This data-driven process of curriculum improvement should allow the Open Curriculum to reach a very high level of quality very quickly (p. 38).”
Bodily, R., Nyland, R., & Wiley, D. (2017). The RISE Framework: Using learning analytics to automatically identify open educational resources for continuous improvement. International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 18(2), 103-122. |
Cost-cutting: OERs Are Proven to Cut Costs
|
OpenStax saved Rice University Students $39 million during the 2015-2016 academic year. Rice University is a private university with a population of about 6,800 undergraduate and graduate students.
Boyd, J. (2016). OpenStax already saved students $39 million this academic year. Rice University News and Media. http://news.rice.edu/2016/01/20/openstax-already-saved-students-39-million-this-academic-year/
|
Customization: OERs Allow for Customization
|
“Faculty members can customize their class instruction for their students. David Wiley, open education proponent, argues compellingly in iterating toward openness’ that OERs can facilitate more meaningful, more inclusive pedagogical practices.”
The possibility to continually change and adapt an existing resource and to put it to new uses is unique to resources that have the property of “open”. Open in this sense means that the resources do not have an inherent end. They need not follow the typical path from design to obsolescence, and adaptations and repurposing can lead them from one phase of maturity to the next. This characteristic gives them an important role in helping the educational enterprise become resilient (Weller, 2014) or anti-fragile (Taleb, 2012), i.e. to be able to benefit from changes to content, context, and teaching and learning strategies.”
Orr, D., Rimini, M, & van Damme, D. (2015). Open Educational Resources: A Catalyst for Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264247543-en
|
Access: OERs Promote Better Accessibility for Everyone
|
“However a consistent result from projects investigating accessibility is that planning for use by disabled students leads to content that serves all users better; for example, making instructions clearer for dyslexic students will also make them clearer for all.”
Scanlon, E., McAndrew, P., & O'Shea, T. (2015). Designing for educational technology to enhance the experience of learners in distance education: How Open Educational Resources, learning design and MOOCS are influencing learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2015(1), Art. 6. http://doi.org/10.5334/jime.al
94 percent of high school students with learning disabilities get some kind of help, just 17 percent of learning-disabled college students do.
National Center for Learning Disabilities. https://www.ncld.org/
|
Success/Retention: OERs Bolster Success and Retention
|
“During the fall semester 2011, 690 students used this book. Compared with students using a traditional text in the spring of 2011, students who used the free online textbook scored higher on departmental final examinations, had higher grade point averages in the class and had higher retention rates.”
Hilton, J., & Laman, C. (2012). One college’s use of an open psychology textbook. Open Learning, 27(3), 265-272. doi:10.1080/02680513.2012.716657
“Eighty-four per cent of students surveyed agreed with the statement that ‘Having a free online book helps me go to college’.”
Hilton, J., & Laman, C. (2012). One college’s use of an open psychology textbook. Open Learning, 27(3), 265-272. doi:10.1080/02680513.2012.716657
Similar conclusions drawn from an OER program at Mercy College:
Pawlyshyn, N. (2013, November 4). Adopting OER: A case study of cross-institutional collaboration and innovation. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/11/adopting-oer-a-case-study-of-crossinstitutional-collaboration-and-innovation
|
Social Justice: Textbook Prices Are a Social Justice Issue
|
“Sure, you could be the super-prepared student who knows how to work the system and get them *all* as rentals — but not every student can be first in line at the bookstore. And the ones at the back of the line — guess their socio-economic class and first generation status?”
Caulfield, M. (2015, November 9). Asking what students spend on textbooks is the wrong questions. Hapgood.us. Retrieved from https://hapgood.us/2015/11/09/asking-what-students-spend-on-textbooks-is-the-wrong-question/
“The net result is that rising textbook and course material costs are most noticeable among low-income, first-generation, and first-year students, all of whom represent the most vulnerable from a student success perspective (Tinto, 2006). “
Salem, J. A. (2017). Open pathways to student success: Academic library partnerships for Open Educational Resource and affordable course content creation and adoption. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.10.003 |
Libraries Can Act as Hubs of OERs and OER Implementation
|
“OER initiatives and university libraries share a determination to improve access to all kinds of scholarly and educational materials, both on their campuses and throughout the world. Given those dovetailing values, partnerships between OER initiatives and libraries seem not just logistically convenient but philosophically obvious.”
Libraries can offer the following OER initiative resources:
Kleymeer, P., Kleinman, M., & Hanss, T. (2010). Reaching the heart of the university: Libraries and the future of OER. In Open ED 2010 Proceedings. Barcelona: UOC, OU, BYU.
“In response to the broken textbook market, libraries are becoming actively involved in the open educational resources (OER) movement. Although there is not a formal program in place, librarians at Utah State University explored a collaborative approach to integrate OER in faculty members' courses. One goal of the effort was to work closely with faculty to consider course objectives and learning outcomes when evaluating and incorporating OER.”
Davis, E., Cochran, D., Fagerheim, B., & Thoms, B. (2016). Enhancing teaching and learning: Libraries and Open Educational Resources in the classroom. Public Services Quarterly, 12(1), 22-35. doi:10.1080/15228959.2015.1108893
|