Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Integrative Review

A guide introducing the process of conducting an integrative review

References

References

Broome M.E. (1993). Integrative literature reviews for the development of concepts. In B.L. Rogers & K. Knafl (Eds.), Concept Development in Nursing, (2nd ed., pp. 231-250). W.B. Saunders Co. 

Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., Kastner, M., & Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reportingJournal of Clinical Epidemiology67(12), 1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013

Collins, J. W., Zoucha, R., Lockhart, J. S., & Mixer, S. J. (2018). Cultural aspects of end-of-life care planning for African Americans: An integrative review of literature. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 29(6), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659617753042

Cowdell, F., Booth, A., & Appleby, B. (2017). Knowledge mobilization in bridging patient–practitioner–researcher boundaries: A systematic integrative review protocolJournal of Advanced Nursing, 73(11), 2757–2764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13378

da Silva, R. N., Brandão, M. A. G., & Ferreira, M. de A. (2020). Integrative review as a method to generate or to test nursing theory. Nursing Science Quarterly, 33(3), 258–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318420920602

Ganeshkumar, P., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2013). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcareJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 2(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.109934

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologiesHealth Information and Libraries Journal26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Hopia, H., Latvala, E., & Liimatainen, L. (2016). Reviewing the methodology of an integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 30(4), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12327

Kastner, M., Antony, J., Soobiah, C., Straus, S. E., & Tricco, A. C. (2016). Conceptual recommendations for selecting the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to answer research questions related to complex evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.022

Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approachBMC Medical Research Methodology18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Munn, Z., Stern, C., Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., & Jordan, Z. (2018). What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4

Tricco, A. C., Antony, J., Soobiah, C., Kastner, M., Cogo, E., Macdonald, H., D’Souza, J., Hui, W., & Straus, S. E. (2016). Knowledge synthesis methods for generating or refining theory: A scoping review reveals that little guidance is available. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.021

Tricco, A. C., Antony, J., Soobiah, C., Kastner, M., MacDonald, H., Cogo, E., Lillie, E., Tran, J., & Straus, S. E. (2016). Knowledge synthesis methods for integrating qualitative and quantitative data: a scoping review reveals poor operationalization of the methodological steps. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 29–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.011

Tricco, A. C., Soobiah, C., Antony, J., Cogo, E., Macdonald, H., Lillie, E., Tran, J., D’Souza, J., Hui, W., Perrier, L., Welch, V., Horsley, T., Straus, S. E., & Kastner, M. (2016). A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.030

Toronto, C. E., & Remington, R. (Eds.). (2020). A step-by-step guide to conducting an integrative review. Springer.

Westlake, C. (2012). Practical tips for literature synthesis. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 26(5), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0b013e318263d766

Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodologyJournal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Whittemore, R., Chao, A., Jang, M., Minges, K. E., & Park, C. (2014). Methods for knowledge synthesis: An overview. Heart & Lung, 43(5), 453–461. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.014