Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Scoping Review

A guide introducing the process of conducting a scoping review

References

References

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological frameworkInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., Kastner, M., & Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology67(12), 1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013

Ganeshkumar, P., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2013). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 2(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.109934

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Khalil, H., Peters, M., Godfrey, C. M., McInerney, P., Soares, C. B., & Parker, D. (2016). An evidence-based approach to scoping reviewsWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing13(2), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12144

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodologyImplementation Science5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

Morris, M., Boruff, J. T., & Gore, G. C. (2016). Scoping reviews: Establishing the role of the librarian. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104(4), 346–353. Medical Library Association. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.020

Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approachBMC Medical Research Methodology18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviewsInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050

Peters, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Trico, A., & Khalil, H. (2020). Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020 version). JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12

Peterson, J., Pearce, P. F., Ferguson, L. A., & Langford, C. A. (2017). Understanding scoping reviews. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 29(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12380

Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & Mcewen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistencyResearch Synthesis Methods5(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123

Westlake, C. (2012). Practical tips for literature synthesis. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 26(5), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0b013e318263d766