Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
If you plan to do a meta-analysis, it is best to follow the standards set forth in Finding What Works in Health Care (see chapter 4):
-"Use expert methodologists to develop, execute, and peer review the meta-analyses."
-"Address heterogeneity among study effects"
-"Accompany all estimates with measures of statistical uncertainty"
-"Assess the sensitivity of conclusions to changes in the protocol, assumptions, and study selection" (Eden et al., 2011, p. 187)
There is also a thorough review of software available for meta-analysis in Appendix B of Systematic Reviews in Health Care, which is available at Gumberg in print and electronically.